Back to blog

Best Practices for Reducing Application Development Costs

Olga Gubanova

-

November 22, 2024

How to Control Development Costs Without Compromising Quality

Reducing app development costs has become essential for companies striving for efficiency. We all aim for perfection, and it seems BMW has hit the mark. Imagine an app that lets you control your car remotely—lock and unlock doors, view your vehicle in 3D, send routes directly to the navigation system, track EV charging, and even use Alexa voice commands. Sounds like something only native development could handle, right?

Here's the twist: BMW built it all using cross-platform technology. They leveraged Flutter to keep costs low without sacrificing quality.

Until 2018, BMW focused primarily on iOS for apps like BMW & MINI Connected, which led to noticeable design and feature gaps on Android devices. Seeking a unified experience across all platforms, BMW ultimately chose Flutter for its cross-platform efficiency. By integrating the 4.x HERE SDK with Flutter, they enhanced mapping and navigation features, delivering a top-notch user experience. Today, the My BMW and MINI apps reach users in over 40 countries worldwide.

While BMW hasn't disclosed their development costs, creating a minimum viable product (MVP) like theirs would typically cost around $80,000 using cross-platform technology. In contrast, a native approach could easily double that figure to $160,000 or more.

Use our calculator to estimate your MVP cost, get a recommended tech stack, and see the project timeline—all in one tool.

Companies like Airbnb, Uber Eats, Alibaba, Reflectly, and Google Ads have also embraced cross-platform development, saving costs while reaching millions of users. They've proven that high-quality apps don't always require expensive native builds.

Find the world’s top Flutter development companies specializing in controlling application development costs here.

Cross-platform development offers significant benefits for streamlining your project and reducing app development costs. But it's not the only strategy out there. So, what other technologies can cut app development costs without sacrificing quality?

Smart Planning: The First Step to Cutting App Development Costs

Smart Planning: The First Step to Cutting App Development Costs

Imagine if Dropbox hadn't done its homework. Without studying how people struggled with file sharing, they might have invested in flashy extras instead of focusing on seamless sync and simplicity. Picture an app overloaded with features no one asked for—elaborate collaboration tools or fancy editing options—but lacking the one thing users truly needed: reliable, cross-device access to their files.

This scenario highlights how effective planning is crucial for reducing app development costs without compromising quality. By focusing on what truly matters to your users, you can avoid unnecessary expenses and allocate resources efficiently. Here's how to set up a cost-effective development plan:

  1. Conduct Thorough Market Research: Understand your audience's needs, pain points, and preferences. Building an app that solves real problems minimizes the risk of costly redesigns later.
  2. Set Clear and Measurable Goals: Define specific outcomes to guide your team and track progress. This ensures resources are focused on what matters most, keeping the project on time and within budget.
  3. Prioritize a Minimum Viable Product (MVP): Launch with only the core features necessary to validate your idea and collect user feedback. You can add additional features in future updates based on real user needs.

Explore our detailed breakdown of popular app categories, where we cover essential features, their importance, and development costs for each category in this comprehensive guide.

By implementing smart planning strategies, you're not just cutting costs—you're setting your app up for success from the start.

Discover the step-by-step process of building a successful MVP in this detailed guide.

Top Technologies to Reduce App Development Costs Without Sacrificing Quality

Top Technologies to Reduce App Development Costs Without Sacrificing Quality

Open-source tools and templates are a solid way to keep development costs down while still building a high-quality app. By tapping into free, community-backed resources, you can save money, speed up development, and rely on proven solutions.

Cross-Platform Development: When It Makes Sense and Why It Saves

Imagine writing your app's code once and having it work on both iOS and Android. That's exactly what cross-platform development offers. Instead of hiring two separate teams to build and maintain two versions of your app, you have one team working on a single codebase.

Why This Is Great for Your Budget

1. Lower Development Costs: Fewer developers are needed, and they spend less time coding. This means you save money on salaries and get your app built faster.

You can save up to 50% compared to native development.

2. Simplified Maintenance: Updates and bug fixes are done once and applied everywhere. This reduces ongoing costs and headaches.

This cuts maintenance costs by up to 30% and makes updates easier.

3. Faster Launch: With just one version to develop, test, and deploy, your app hits the market sooner. This can give you a competitive edge.

Cross-platform development saves 60-80% in time, helping apps launch faster and gain a competitive edge.

4. Quality That Matches Native Apps

Wondering if a cross-platform app can match a native one? With tools like Flutter and React Native, it absolutely can.

  • Smooth Performance: These tools compile your app into native code, so it runs quickly and smoothly, just like apps built separately for each platform.
  • Beautiful Designs: You can create stunning user interfaces that look and feel right at home on any device.
  • Access to Device Features: Need GPS, camera, or notifications? Cross-platform apps can use all these native features without missing a beat.

For a deeper dive into the strengths and challenges of Flutter, check out our article by Ptolemay's lead Flutter developer, Sukhrob Djumaev, here.

Comparing Cross-Platform and Native Development

Aspect Cross-Platform Development Native Development
Development Cost $50,000–$100,000 (single codebase for iOS & Android) $80,000–$160,000 (separate iOS and Android teams)
Time-to-Market 4–6 months (one development cycle) 6–12 months (two parallel cycles)
Maintenance Costs 20–30% of initial costs per year (single update process) 35–50% of initial costs per year (separate updates)
Performance 85–95% of native (suitable for most apps) 100% (ideal for high-performance apps like 3D games)
Customizability High, with slight limitations for advanced features Unlimited customization
Reusability 80–90% of the code reused across platforms None—separate codebases for each platform
User Base Reach Both iOS and Android users (one app) Separate apps for iOS and Android
Skill Requirements Generalist developers familiar with frameworks like Flutter or React Native Specialized developers for Swift (iOS) and Kotlin (Android)
App Store Submission Same app for both platforms Separate submissions, adhering to different guidelines
Example Apps My BMW, Reflectly, Google Ads WhatsApp, Instagram, Uber (initial native versions)

Build a truly native app with advanced features like infinite scroll using lean, modern technologies—find out how in Flutter here.

Progressive Web Apps (PWAs): The Smart, Simple Solution for Web and Mobile

Progressive Web Apps (PWAs) are web applications that deliver an app-like experience through modern web technologies. They combine the reach of the web with the functionality of native apps, providing a seamless user experience across all devices.

Instead of managing separate development teams for iOS and Android, PWAs allow you to build a single application that works on any device with a web browser—desktop, mobile, or tablet. This unified development approach doesn't just simplify the process; it can reduce development costs by up to 50%.

Real-World Success Stories

  • Twitter Lite: Twitter launched Twitter Lite as a PWA to improve the mobile web experience for users in areas with unreliable internet connectivity. The result? A 65% increase in pages per session, a 75% increase in Tweets sent, and a 20% decrease in bounce rate.
  • Starbucks: Starbucks developed a PWA for their ordering system, enabling customers to browse the menu, customize orders, and add items to their carts without consistent internet access. The PWA is 99.84% smaller than their native iOS app, leading to a significant increase in daily active users.
  • Uber: Uber's PWA allows users to book rides even on low-speed networks. It's designed to load in less than 3 seconds on 2G networks, expanding Uber's reach to emerging markets where network speeds are a challenge.

Savings Beyond Development

Once the app is live, PWAs continue to offer cost benefits:

  • Instant Updates: Unlike native apps that require approval from app stores for updates, PWAs can be updated instantly. This means you can deploy fixes and new features rapidly, responding to user feedback in real-time.
  • Simplified Maintenance: Maintaining one codebase reduces the time and resources needed for updates and bug fixes, lowering ongoing operational costs.
  • No App Store Fees: PWAs bypass app stores, eliminating fees associated with app submissions and transactions.

Native-Level Quality with Web Simplicity

Modern PWAs offer features that rival native apps:

  • Offline Functionality: Thanks to service workers, PWAs can function offline or on unreliable networks by caching essential resources.
  • Push Notifications: Engage users with timely updates and alerts, just like native apps.
  • Home Screen Installation: Users can add PWAs to their device's home screen, providing quick access without the need to download from an app store.
  • Access to Device Features: PWAs can utilize device capabilities like camera access, geolocation, and motion sensors.

Comparing to Cross-Platform Frameworks

While PWAs and cross-platform frameworks like Flutter or React Native both aim to reduce development time and costs, they serve different needs:

  • PWAs: Best for broad reach and ease of access without installation barriers. Ideal when you want instant updates and SEO benefits.
  • Cross-Platform Apps: Better when you need more native functionality and presence in app stores. Suitable for apps requiring extensive native features or better performance for complex tasks.

Comparative Analysis: PWAs vs. Native and Cross-Platform Apps

Aspect PWAs Native Apps Cross-Platform Apps
Development Cost Lowest—single codebase for all platforms Highest—separate codebases for each platform Moderate—single codebase but may require platform-specific tweaks
Performance High—but may not match the performance of native apps in resource-intensive tasks Highest—optimized for each platform High—close to native performance
User Experience Consistent across all devices, but may lack some native UI elements Best—full access to native UI components Consistent, with near-native UI elements
Access to Device Features Limited—depends on browser support Full access Nearly full access through plugins or modules
Installation Added to home screen from the browser—no app store required Installed via app stores Installed via app stores
Discoverability Indexed by search engines—better web SEO Discoverable in app stores Discoverable in app stores
Update Process Automatic—users always access the latest version Manual—users need to download updates from app stores Manual—same as native apps

When to Choose PWAs

  • Broad Audience Reach: If you aim to reach users across various devices and platforms with minimal friction, PWAs are ideal.
  • Budget Constraints: For limited budgets, PWAs offer a cost-effective way to deliver a high-quality app experience.
  • Rapid Deployment: PWAs allow for faster development cycles and immediate updates, which is crucial for startups needing quick market entry.
  • SEO Benefits: Since PWAs are essentially websites, they are indexed by search engines, improving discoverability.

Potential Limitations of PWAs

While PWAs have many advantages, they may not be the perfect fit for every scenario:

  • Limited Access to Native APIs: Some advanced device features (like Bluetooth, NFC, or advanced camera controls) may not be fully accessible.
  • Browser Support Variance: Not all browsers support all PWA features equally. For example, some iOS browsers have limitations with service workers and push notifications.
  • App Store Presence: If being listed on the Apple App Store or Google Play Store is important for credibility or discoverability, a PWA won't appear there (though technologies like Trusted Web Activities can bridge this gap on Android).

Why Clerk.com Is a Budget-Friendly Game-Changer for Startups

Authentication is the backbone of most modern apps, but building it from scratch can be a time-consuming and costly process. Enter Clerk.com, a comprehensive “plug-and-play” solution for user management, social login, multi-factor authentication (MFA), and more. For startups looking to launch quickly without compromising on quality or security, Clerk is a no-brainer.

Why Clerk.com Saves You Money

Developing authentication systems from scratch involves hiring developers with specialized expertise, lengthy development cycles, and rigorous testing to ensure security. With Clerk, you get a ready-made, fully integrated solution that slashes costs and speeds up your time-to-market.

Here’s how it delivers value:

  • Pre-Built Authentication Features: Social login, MFA, and user profile management are ready to go—no need for custom development.
  • Developer Efficiency: Focus your engineering efforts on building core app features instead of reinventing the wheel with authentication systems.

Startups using Clerk can reduce authentication development costs by up to 70% compared to building custom solutions.

Budget-Friendly Without Compromising Security

Security breaches are expensive—not just financially but also in terms of reputation. Clerk.com eliminates the need to hire security experts by providing robust, enterprise-grade security features that are tested and trusted at scale.

  • Secure by Design: Clerk is built with modern security protocols, including encryption, OAuth2, and OpenID Connect, ensuring user data is always protected.
  • High-Conversion Social Single Sign-On (SSO): Allow users to log in via platforms like Google, Facebook, and Apple with just one click, boosting login rates and reducing user drop-off.

Startups can save significant resources while offering a seamless, secure user experience that rivals enterprise-grade solutions.

Scalable Solutions for Startups That Plan to Grow

Clerk.com is designed to grow with your business. Whether you're onboarding your first 100 users or scaling to millions, Clerk can handle the load without requiring expensive infrastructure upgrades or re-architecting.

  • Flexible Plans: Clerk’s pricing adapts to your needs, ensuring you only pay for what you use, keeping costs predictable.
  • Future-Proof Scalability: As your user base expands, Clerk's infrastructure ensures smooth performance, even during spikes in traffic.

For startups aiming for rapid scaling, Clerk eliminates the need for costly upgrades down the line.

Clerk.com Is Trusted by Big Names

Clerk.com is backed by industry heavyweights, including CRV, Stripe, and Andreessen Horowitz, who invested $30 million in early 2024. These endorsements from top-tier investors reflect Clerk’s proven reliability and innovation.

  • Adopted by Leading Startups: Clerk’s user-friendly authentication is trusted by emerging startups to streamline onboarding and reduce development overhead.
  • Validated by Investors: With backing from companies like Stripe, you’re relying on a solution that’s built for long-term success.

When to Choose Clerk.com

Clerk is an excellent choice if:

  • Your startup needs authentication systems fast and on a budget.
  • Security is a priority, but you don’t have the in-house expertise to build it.
  • You’re focused on scaling without worrying about infrastructure.

For startups, Clerk.com combines cost savings, enterprise-grade security, and effortless scalability into one seamless solution. Why reinvent the wheel when you can integrate a trusted system that’s ready to go out of the box?

Comparison: Clerk.com vs. Alternatives

Feature Clerk.com Firebase Authentication Auth0 Okta
Primary Focus User management, social login, and multi-factor authentication (MFA) User authentication with real-time database integration Enterprise-level authentication with extensive integrations Comprehensive identity management for large enterprises
Ease of Use Extremely user-friendly; designed for startups Easy for developers familiar with Firebase ecosystem Moderately easy; requires setup for advanced configurations Complex; aimed at larger organizations with technical teams
Scalability Scales efficiently from startups to large user bases Scales well but tied closely to Firebase infrastructure Highly scalable for both startups and enterprises Best for enterprise-level scalability
Pricing Pay-as-you-go; affordable for startups Free tier with basic authentication; higher tiers add costs Free tier available; premium plans for advanced features Expensive; enterprise pricing tailored to organizational needs
Security Features Built-in MFA, OAuth2, OpenID, encryption Basic security; lacks advanced enterprise-grade MFA Enterprise-grade MFA, advanced encryption Enterprise-grade MFA, adaptive security policies
Integration Works seamlessly with other tools like Stripe and third-party apps Best for Firebase-based ecosystems Extensive integrations with over 2,000 apps Focused on enterprise-level tools like Salesforce, Workday
Customizability High; allows tailored user flows and branding Limited; mostly predefined flows Highly customizable for both branding and user experience High, but primarily suited for complex enterprise needs
Notable Clients Used by startups in fintech, SaaS, and e-commerce Common in gaming, social media, and content-sharing apps Trusted by global enterprises like Mazda and VMware Used by Fortune 500 companies like T-Mobile and FedEx
Best For Startups and growing companies focused on simplicity and scalability Startups with apps already using Firebase Enterprises needing a robust, customizable authentication tool Enterprises with complex identity management requirements

Additional Technologies That Cut Development Costs (But May Impact Quality)

Technologies That Cut Development Costs

Here’s a list of more cost-saving technologies that can help get your app to market faster but may come with trade-offs in customization or performance:

Low-Code and No-Code Platforms

Low-code and no-code platforms like Flutterflow and Bubble are a quick way to get an app off the ground. Instead of diving into custom coding, you use visual tools and pre-made elements, which can cut development costs by as much as 60%. It’s a popular choice for startups needing a fast launch with basic features. But the catch? Limited customization. If your app has complex requirements or needs to scale significantly, low-code platforms may fall short, as they aren’t built for handling highly specific or intricate functionality.

Comparison: Low-Code Platforms vs. Traditional Development

Aspect Low-Code Platforms Traditional Development
Development Time 2–4 months (for MVPs) 6–12 months
Cost $10,000–$50,000 $50,000–$200,000
Customizability Moderate—best for standard features High—tailored solutions for unique needs
Scalability Limited for high-traffic apps Unlimited
Skill Requirements Minimal—basic technical knowledge High—requires experienced developers
Best For MVPs, simple apps, rapid prototyping Complex apps, enterprise-grade solutions

Top Low-Code Platforms Compared

Platform Best For Cost Strengths Weaknesses
Bubble MVPs, startups with minimal resources Free tier; Paid plans from $25/month Easy to use, flexible for MVPs Limited scalability for enterprise apps
FlutterFlow Cross-platform mobile apps Paid plans from $30/month Integrates well with Google services, supports Firebase Requires coding for advanced features
OutSystems Enterprise solutions Enterprise pricing Strong integration capabilities, robust support High cost for small startups
Adalo Basic mobile apps Free tier; Paid plans from $50/month Intuitive for simple apps, affordable Lacks advanced features for scaling

When to Choose Low-Code Platforms

Low-code platforms are an excellent choice if:

  • Your Goal Is Rapid Prototyping: Ideal for building MVPs quickly and testing market fit.
  • You Have Budget Constraints: Allows you to build functional apps at a fraction of traditional development costs.
  • Your App Is Relatively Simple: Best for apps with standard features like forms, user management, and notifications.

However, if your app requires complex logic, real-time data processing, or enterprise-grade security, you may need to explore traditional or cross-platform development.

For a comprehensive list of top cross-platform development companies specializing in startup projects, explore our curated selection here.

Hybrid App Frameworks

Hybrid frameworks like Apache Cordova and Ionic allow you to build one app that runs on both iOS and Android. This approach can save you about 40-50% in costs compared to building separate native apps, and it’s often used for simpler apps that don’t rely on intensive graphics or processing. However, hybrid apps might not feel as smooth or fast as native ones. Since they’re based on web code wrapped in a native shell, they can lag, especially in interactions or graphic-heavy sections. If a seamless, high-performance experience is critical, you may need to go fully native.

Backend as a Service (BaaS)

With options like Firebase and AWS Amplify, BaaS platforms offer a ready-made backend so you can focus on building the app itself. For startups or MVPs, this can reduce backend costs by up to 40%. But BaaS isn’t ideal for every app. As your needs grow, you may find BaaS restrictive since these platforms aren’t built for extensive customization or complex server configurations. It’s a fast solution for simple backend needs, but if your app grows significantly, moving to a custom backend can become a costly adjustment.

Serverless Architecture

Serverless platforms like AWS Lambda and Google Cloud Functions only charge you for the exact server time used, making them a budget-friendly option, potentially saving 15-30% compared to traditional server setups. Serverless is perfect for apps with variable loads, but it has limitations. It’s not suited for apps requiring continuous or real-time processing, as serverless functions are optimized for short tasks. If your app depends on consistent, always-on service, serverless can lead to delays or lag.

Pre-Made UI Kits

For building an app’s interface quickly, pre-made UI kits like Bootstrap, Material-UI, and Ant Design are a lifesaver. They come with all the essentials—buttons, forms, layouts—allowing you to skip custom design work and saving up to 50% on front-end costs. However, using these kits can result in a generic look and feel since many other apps use the same components. If brand differentiation and unique design are priorities, you might feel limited by a UI kit’s standard components and layouts.

FAQ: Reducing Application Development Costs

What is the biggest cost in software development?

The biggest cost in software development is often labor, which includes developers, designers, and project managers. The complexity of the app, the technology stack, and the need for specialized skills all contribute to labor costs. Other significant expenses can include backend infrastructure, third-party integrations, and ongoing maintenance.

How can software development costs be reduced?

Reducing software development costs starts with efficient project management. Using Agile methodologies, cross-functional teams, and tools like automated testing can streamline processes and catch issues early. Prioritizing reusable components and open-source solutions can also reduce development time and save resources.

What are the various approaches used to reduce the cost of rework?

To minimize rework costs, implement continuous testing and feedback loops during development. Using Agile methods, frequent check-ins, and automated testing helps identify issues early. Planning thoroughly in the initial stages also reduces rework by clarifying requirements upfront, making changes less likely down the line.

How can improving quality reduce cost?

Improving quality at each stage of development reduces long-term costs by preventing bugs, rework, and user dissatisfaction. Investing in thorough planning, user research, and early testing improves the app’s quality, reducing the likelihood of costly fixes or updates post-launch.

Can I write off software development costs?

Yes, software development costs can often be written off as business expenses. In many cases, they are either capitalized or amortized over time. However, tax laws vary by location, so consult a tax professional for guidance on maximizing deductions and understanding eligibility.

How much does it cost to develop an app?

The cost to develop an app varies widely depending on complexity, features, and development approach. Simple apps can start at around $10,000–$30,000, while complex custom apps with advanced features can exceed $100,000. Using cross-platform tools and starting with an MVP can help control costs.

What is software development cost estimation?

Software development cost estimation is the process of predicting the overall cost of a project based on its requirements, scope, and resources. Accurate estimation involves understanding the app’s complexity, required features, and choosing an appropriate development approach. Tools like app cost calculators can help provide a more precise estimate.

How much does custom app development cost?

Custom app development can range from $50,000 to over $200,000, depending on the features, design complexity, and platform requirements. Custom solutions typically involve a tailored backend, unique features, and thorough testing, which makes them more expensive than standard or template-based apps.

How do you calculate app development cost?

App development costs are calculated based on factors like hourly rates, feature complexity, and chosen platforms. The formula is typically (Hours Needed x Hourly Rate) + Additional Costs (like design and testing). Online calculators, like an Ptolemay’s app cost calculator, can provide a quick estimate by factoring in key elements specific to your project.

Ready to bring your app idea to life on a budget?

At Ptolemay, we understand that efficient, budget-conscious development is essential for startups and businesses alike.

Start with our app development cost calculator to quickly estimate app cost based on your unique requirements. In just minutes, get a clear view of development expenses and an actionable, budget-friendly roadmap.

Meet Our Expert Flutter Development Team

Our full-cycle Flutter development team at Ptolemay specializes in building high-quality, cross-platform apps from start to finish. With expert skills in Dart, backend integrations, and seamless UX across iOS and Android, we handle everything to make your app launch smooth and efficient.